Closing Watch · Issue 02
The house was insured.
The ground wasn't.
Why landslide damage can fall outside a standard homeowners policy.

At a glance
What needs separate confirmation?
- Standard California homeowners policies generally exclude earth movement, including landslide, subsidence, erosion, and shifting soil.
- A buyer may secure homeowners insurance and satisfy a lender without covering a known land-movement exposure.
- Insurance review and geotechnical due diligence answer different questions for hillside and coastal properties.
- The cause of a loss, the evidence, and the policy language can change the coverage analysis.
Closing Watch
The house was insured. The ground wasn't.
Rancho Palos Verdes is trying to solve an insurance problem that became painfully clear after land movement damaged homes across the peninsula: a homeowners policy can cover the building while excluding the ground beneath it.
A 2024 city survey found that none of the surveyed residents in the affected landslide area had insurance that covered landslide damage. The city is now seeking support for a separate insurance program modeled after the California Earthquake Authority or FAIR Plan. That program does not exist yet.
The coverage problem comes from the cause of the damage. Standard California homeowners policies generally exclude earth movement, including landslide, subsidence, erosion, and shifting soil. Flood insurance also generally excludes landslide damage.
That distinction matters during a transaction. A buyer may secure homeowners insurance, satisfy the lender, and close escrow without having coverage for a known land movement exposure. The policy is active. The house is insured. The landslide risk may still sit outside the contract.
For hillside and coastal properties, an insurance review and geotechnical due diligence answer different questions. Before contingencies are removed, the buyer and lender may need to review seller disclosures, geological reports, repair history, visible movement, utility interruptions, and any prior insurance claims. Insurance should not be treated as a substitute for that work.
There can be exceptions when a covered event, such as a fire, is determined to be the predominant cause of the land movement. The facts and policy language matter. But the larger lesson is simple: confirming that a policy can be issued does not confirm that every major risk affecting the property is covered.
A property can have an active insurance policy while still carrying a major uninsured exposure.
Deal Context
The age of a leak can change the claim.
In a recent published California appellate case, the court revived a homeowner's water damage claim because the insurer had not established how long the pipe had leaked before applying a continuous leakage exclusion. The damage matters, but so does evidence showing when it began.
Partner Language
Two sentences you can use
The house was insured. The ground wasn't.
A property can have an active insurance policy while still carrying a major uninsured exposure.
Close
Send the property before insurance becomes the closing problem.
If you have a property under contract with a difficult location, unusual occupancy, or prior damage, send it to me before insurance becomes the closing problem. I can review the insurance issues while there is still time to address them.
Sources
Sources for this issue

About the author
Jessie Navarro
Jessie Navarro is the agency principal at J. Navarro Insurance Agency Inc. in Redondo Beach, California. He works with property owners, real estate professionals, lenders, investors, and businesses on insurance questions that can affect transactions and long-term ownership.
About Jessie and the agencyNewsletter content is general information, not a coverage determination or legal advice. Coverage depends on policy terms, exclusions, and underwriting. Information may change after an issue is published.
